Monday, May 04, 2009

Indian Education Market: Manipal K-12

I have been interested in the Indian educational market and this is the first of a series in which I will write about companies in this space. In this post I am profiling Manipal K-12.

Manipal K-12 , a player in the Indian K-12 school market, has been promoted by Manipal group, a leader in higher education in India. and TutorVista, a global online tutoring company. TutorVista is promoted by K Ganesh, who had earlier founded, along with Meena Ganesh one of India’s early BPO companies CustomerAsset which they sold to ICICI OneSource. Meena is the CEO of Manipal K12.

TutorVista’s online tutoring focus is largely the US market. The company, which had raised VC funding from Sequoia Capital, Lightspeed Venture Partners and Silicon Valley Bank in 2006, entered the domestic Indian market by acquiring Edurite Technologies in late 2007.

Edurite Technologies (it still maintains a separate website) was set up in 2000 by Srikanth Iyer and over the years has developed an impressive library of multimedia content in the Indian K-12 segment. Srikanth is the COO of the company.

I must mention that in the late 1990s there was considerable interest in creating educational multimedia content. In 1998 I had co-founded Aesthetic Technologies with the same broad business objective. We too had developed content for the K-12 market but for schools in Singapore and Malaysia.

The strengths of the various partners brings a certain uniqueness to Manipal K-12. The flagship product targeted at schools is DigitALly™ a PowerPoint enabled multimedia tool consisting of hardware (interactive whiteboard or plasma TV) and software (the multimedia learning content developed by Edurite over the last several years). The digital solution enhances the quality of teaching and effectiveness of the teachers. Manipal K12 also targets the coaching segment of the market with Edurite Tutorials (physical centers) and TutorVista (online presence).

The key proposition is simple enough: use technology to deliver top quality standardized learning at low cost independent of the physical location of the student. It is a thought that has been at the core of technology-aided learning. There is considerable interest in this market. Educomp with its Smart class, Everonn with its ViTELs, NIIT with its Interactive Classroom and IL&FS Educational & Technology Services are direct competitors. Smart class accounted for 60% of Educomp’s Rs. 145 cr (USD 29 mil.) revenue in the quarter ended Dec 09 (source: website).

How scalable is this business? Consider the following facts.
India has about a 1 million schools out of which 75,000 are private schools. The private schools are further classified into:
• Approx. 30,000 Government aided schools with an average monthly fee of Rs. 450 (USD 9).
• Approx. 30,000 un-aided “standard” private schools with an average monthly of Rs. 750 (USD 15)
• Approx 15000 un-aided “premium” schools with monthly fee upwards of Rs, 1250 (USD 25)

At this point, the key addressable market is the 45,000 private unaided schools. According to a IDFC-SSKI report the reach of the key players is about 1000 schools each for Educomp and NIIT and 1000 schools for Everonn and IL&FS combined. That leaves a lot of room for growth.

It does, in my opinion, for the next few years. However, schools are investing in ICT infrastructure, often with the help of these same companies. In a few years time, it is possible the private unaided schools would want to be free to buy content from any publisher and not bound to multi-year contracts that are the norm today. At that point, I hope, the market would move to the public schools. It is in this market, which cannot attract decent teachers, that technology can really create a disruption. To enable this to be possible Public Private partnership paradigms will have to be established and/or companies like Manipal K-12 will have to have working relationships with educational NGOs. Most importantly, costs would have to be driven down.. At this point, Educomp charges Rs. 150 per student per month. This is 12% (or less) of the average tuition costs in a private premium school but is 33% of that in an aided private school. At current costs, these companies will find it hard to get the scale that India’s large population warrants.

Manipal K-12 will potentially be able to drive down costs given its in-house content development expertise. Its other approach is to set up its own brand of schools either directly owned or managed. The idea is to bring in good learning content, trained teachers and efficient academic management processes. The K-12 market size in India is large. CLSA estimates the total size to be USD 20 bn. (based the reasonably conservative annual fee assumptions indicated above). Can organized players emerge in this sector? Manipal K-12 does have the advantages of the brand and the technology infrastructure. Having said that, the success of a school in India is based on board-level examination success and it does take years to build reputation. Good schools in India and elsewhere are built by dedicated teachers and principals and therefore the question that I am mulling is: how can an organization like Manipal K-12 create a cadre of great teachers?

Perhaps the answer lies in the other market that Manipal K-12 is trying to target: the tutoring market. CLSA estimates that the market size to be USD 5 bn. (and this does not include specific tutoring for competitive exams and for specialized skill training). However, the market is fragmented, and likely to remain so. Tutors will come from a variety of backgrounds: young students, experienced teachers and patient mothers. However, this may provide Manipal K-12 a very wide recruiting ground for future teachers.

Success of organizations like Manipal K-12 will ultimately depend on execution. There are three key components of an execution strategy: customer (student/parent) satisfaction, entrepreneurial management of individual schools (while using standard processes and technology) and teacher talent management (motivating the ultimate knowledge worker). The business of education is that of people building people. Technology and facilities help to a point.

5 comments:

S T Manikandan said...

Hi Sanjoy,

Multimedia enabled content for K-12 education market is really getting crowded. However who is able get large market size and sustained advantage depends on who is driving the expansion. Are the schools or teachers or parents the driver? Private school management hardly has any motivation to pay to Multimedia content owners unless driven by parent’s pressure. Again only animation and videos help students to like the subject is the question not answered/not measurable to parent? In public schools, whether value addition to teaching will be similar to private schools because of multimedia enabled teaching? If a value addition is so obvious can a company get revenue from parents directly?

I am convinced that three things have to be explored if any serious player want to make good impact and help in India producing better future generation.

1. Teaching has to with fun and love without intimidating students. Multimedia content will enable student to get initial enthusiasm and teacher and management plays good role in developing a confident, well headed personality of children.
2. Children always learn faster than teachers and they lean more from outside the schools. We can streamline the process and children should get exposed to real life professional, since teacher doesn’t know about outside world.
3. The above two are possible with under encouraging management who keeps the teachers as the main drivers and keeping least assets and least cost model. Probably tutoring/evening class market may be good entry to experiment.

Currently I am working with small group of scientists to develop the content and teaching methods to explore in this space. Like to know about your opinion and interest.

S T Manikandan
http://www.linkedin.com/in/discoverdata
stmanikandan@gmail.com

navneet said...
This post has been removed by the author.
navneet said...

Different perspectives:

Lets leave alone the targeted growth or the actual growth in the sector. To be truthful enough, I would say I can't see the IT enabled tutoring going where it should have gone.. its not even near to that. I have done my schooling from good schools and colleges in Mumbai and Rajasthan.

As per my limited understanding on the subject, I feel somewhere industry is missing out on the most important factor in the whole story.. "the students".

I have seen how uncomfortable students had been when one of our professor offered online notes and exams. Students want to interact.. they want to talk to someone.. have a discussion.. and more often need to 'hear' things. Making mistakes is another vital part of learning. And I don't see a solution around that facilitates students to make mistakes and guides them through corrective measures.

Leaving apart the issues of availability of desired infrastructure, which will take its course. But, until we acknowledge issues concerning the learning methodologies.. growth will remain confined between the 'targeted' growth which I feel is understated from the real.


with my limited understanding...
+nav

Sanjoy Sanyal said...

Thanks for your comments. Navneet - you are right. Online only learning does not work. The key is to blend the online and offline together. Manikandan - your experiment methodologies and results should be interesting. Maybe you want to share them?

Anonymous said...

Hi All,

The overall system of education needs a revamp. With the current unorganized system there is a lot of undigested/unanalyzed topics which just pass through or lie as black boxes without the awareness that they are really black boxes in the heads of students. There is a lot of push rather than pull. Its a mad race trying to create carbon copies of so called best students. First the psychological, and intelligence aspects of acquiring, sharing and creating knowledge, new ways for assessment needs to be very well understood before just making the old way much more fancy with technology for commercial benefits. Technology is a small component, but understanding average student psychology, enabling their different intelligence levels will always require personal touch which means - Passionate Teachers. Not sure if any of the companies listed could teach passion for teachers or just make teachers also as carbon copies of their own process.

-NR